- 主题
- 回帖
- 0
- 精华
- 注册时间
- 2003-3-2
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 爆棚声望
-
- PGB
-
|
楼主 |
发表于 2006-12-15 18:46
|
显示全部楼层
|
<p>原文地址在 <a href="http://fm-britain.co.uk/index.php?page=articles&view=news&news_id=84">http://fm-britain.co.uk/index.php?page=articles&view=news&news_id=84</a>。<br/>全文如下（谢谢原作者 wwfan）<br/><br/><strong><font size="4">Attacking Settings <br/></font></strong><br/>Written by <strong>wwfan</strong><br/><br/>All the following information (unless specified) is based on a flat 4-4-2 playing in the Conf North. It should also be used as a supplement for the previous tactical pieces.<br/><br/><i>Forward Runs and Attacking</i><br/><br/>These have ben significantly reprogrammed and work very, very differently than they did in '06. I now believe they are key as to dominating possession. The most important area is FWRs for attackers.<br/><br/>When playing AI teams I noticed that, in a flat midfield, the AI MCs were playing as an MCd and MCa. One would always link up with the attack and one would sit in front of the back four. My MCs didn't seem to do this and constantly got in the way of each other. It didn't seem to matter if I split their mentalities a la RoT or left them on the same mentality with Ro3 blocks. As I believe the AI is pretty much Global, I decided another factor must be determining relative positions. I played one MC with no FWRs and the other with them on Often, and voila, a split MCd/MCa midfield which was beginning to offer better passing options. Prevously I had been splitting them as either Rarely/Mixed or Mixed/Often, but the new split of Rarely/Often was the bomb!<br/><br/>Possession grew steadily, and was beginning to match the AI. I was suffering from supersaint's problem of defending with reasonable efficiency (as my team only has one defender who has tackling better than 2, this is very relative), having a fantastic goals per shot on target ration (close to 50%), but not creating enough of them. I wanted to be able to have 55%+ possession, which, I assumed would produce more chances, and, if my G/SOT ration stayed high, a lot of quality performances.<br/><br/>I was suffering from the same issues many have reported: isolated attackers. Neither RoT nor Ro3 seemed to make any difference. They still lost possession all too easily. Then came the brainwave. My FC was a dominating target man who was winning 75%+ of his headers (H13-J14 is huge at Conf North level) and was scoring but not assisting. He kept on winning balls in the air but the opposition kept on picking up the scraps. So, I reduced his FWRs to rarely, with the other FC on mixed. Instant results. In the next two games he assisted 4 goals from 5, three being flick ons to the faster mixed FWRs FC, and one being a cushioned header back to the breaking MCa. Passing percentage went through the roof, with a 10% advantage over the AI, and I began to dominate possession (58% game one; 52% game two). I also improved crossing to being 10-15% better than the AI and was still winning 75%+ headers. <br/><br/>Observationally, the FC Target Man was dropping deeper to win headers, but with the wingers and MCa on FWRs often, and the FC on mixed, he was heading balls to players close to him, which was tearing the opposition apart. The old issue of stiker isolation was gone, and the team played compact, attractive football. Chance conversion remained high, but there were more of them. I think this is a KEY element to beating the AI in '07 and is a massive shift in thinking from '06. Please report on how this switch influences your play.<br/><br/><i>Notes</i><br/><br/>I am beginning to get the FBs to overlap now. FWrs to often and a wide formation with focus passing down both flanks seems to do the trick. I am holding up the ball with both FCs, which helps them have time to get into position, but HUB with wingers may help too. I have yet to try though. <br/><br/>FWRs are KEY and setting them correctly is a must. Best values seem to be:<br/><br/><i>Home</i><br/><br/>FBs: Often (be careful when the AI switches to the 4-4-2 Long Farrows)<br/>DCs: Rarely<br/>MCd: Rarely<br/>ML/R: Often ??? (Maybe mixed would help with overlapping fullbacks; some testing required)<br/>MCa: Often<br/>FCd/TM: Rarely<br/>FCa: Mixed<br/><br/>I need to experiment with away settings, but obviously they need to be toned down to stop gaps appearing in the back four. <br/><br/><i>Attacking Midfielders/AMCs</i><br/><br/>There have been issues with isolation for AMCs, especially when using the RoT. I would suggest experimenting with FWRs rarely (if you want him to be a playmaker) or mixed to see if they are better settings and help him get involved more. As I see it, the MCa becomes an AMC with FWRs Often, so maybe the AMC's best settings are Rarely??<br/><br/><i>Playmaker/MCd/DMC</i><br/><br/>With my current set up, the MCd is always in huge amounts of space and can pick his passes. Employing a playmaker in the MCd position, with FWRs to rarely, may be a masterstroke. <br/><br/><br/>I need to do some further testing to see how all this affects RoT. It may revitalise it, it may not help. However, I am 95% sure that toning down FWRs for front players, expecially Target Men, is the way towards better possession and higher quality chance creation.<br/></p> |
|
发表于 2006-12-15 18:37
