Does it matter if I play a player out of position?
The answer to that is a mix of both yes and no. In an ideal world, with all things equal, you’d have a player Accomplished or better in each position. They’ll be more comfortable, they’ll perform to a higher and a more consistent standard and will be less likely to be targeted as a weakness by the opposition.
This isn’t to say that you can’t play someone out of position though, either on a regular basis or in times of need. For the latter, you can often plug someone in to ‘do a job’ and they’ll typically perform well enough to get by, particularly if the rest of the team is strong and the tactical structure helps to support them. Playing someone out of position longer-term, on the other hand, can work if the player’s attributes lend themselves well to the position and role assigned to them, and they’ll gradually learn and improve in that position the more they play there.
This ties into the overall concept of footballing ‘universality’; the idea that any player can play in any position as long as he’s well-trained and has a certain number of fundamental attributes in place. This is much harder to commit to and make work in practice than it is in theory, but the concept of a player being used in an unfamiliar or entirely different position isn’t a new one, and it isn’t something you should necessarily shy away from if you feel it can work within the framework of your tactics. 强迫症不适应，本来全是绿的，练着练着 ，不全绿了。{:16_798:}，心里躁。 不是整體比較好，是戰術的構想和球員職責能配合戰術才能發放出真正的實力，只要球員基本上能踢那位置職責已經能夠很好地發揮作用了 绿茵场的贵公子 发表于 2019-6-20 08:52
也就是说神阵都是整体比较好的？
只能说“神阵”都是激进和高风险的，在传球等战术风格上是偏混合的。所以大部分类似的打法，相对于技战术能力，更依赖于球员的运动能力和拼搏精神，再加上bt角球和界外球，使得平均战绩比较好。 {:16_802:}{:16_800:}{:16_796:}{:16_803:}{:16_820:} 本帖最后由 bnj 于 2019-6-22 09:29 编辑
我用leeds由英冠到英超一直都是打進攻的，英超單賽季進球大概13X球，目前四個前鋒CA都是153-151的實力
页:
[1]